
Yesterday evening we had a LibDem Leadership Contest evening with two MPs each presenting the case for the candidate they are supporting.
Tom Brake, MP for Carshalton and Wallington, explained his support for Chris Huhne by claiming that the party needs to be bold in its actions and that Chris was the more prepared to take chances. He proposed that communication skills were increasingly important, pointing to Chris's years as a journalist as evidence of his superior abilities in this area. Finally, Tom said that the leader should ideally have a track record outside politics, and that Chris's success in creating and growing his own business was an effective demonstration of his strength here.
Norman Baker, MP for Lewes, countered that what was required was someone who would look good in three years, not six months, and that Nick Clegg was the more likely to do this. There were two reasons for this : first, Nick had an image that was more likely to find favour with Conservative voters and, second, he was a safe candidate. Norman's analogy was that the two candidates might end up at the same destination, but that Chris would take a rollercoaster route, while Nick would take the smoother, more direct path.

Both MPs agreed that would be perfectly happy serving under either candidate and stressed that there were no policy differences between the two, with the one exception of Trident, where Chris would consider its replacement in some years time by a home-grown, smaller deterrent, while Nick would continue with it or an American replacement.
While the lack of policy differences and the agreement that both candidates were top-notch possibilities meant there was a lack of fireworks during the evening, the session gave the 30-40 people attending a real insight into the thinking of MPs on the subject. Sharing an informal meal afterwards extended the opportunity to talk to the MPs and to gain further nuggets of information.
I gave Norman a lift to the station afterwards and chatted with him while we waited for his train. He told me about his recent book on the death of Dr David Kelly, which concludes that it was a murder rather than a suicide. It has proved very popular, with a third impression being printed.
